INWOM
Security infrastructure against coordinated AI agent attacks.
Playground
THE ATTACK SURFACE IS CHANGING

AI agents are no longer acting alone.

Thousands of machines
can coordinate an attack
at machine speed.

They can explore in parallel, share discoveries, divide work, adapt, and combine capabilities before traditional security understands that the individual events are connected.

Scroll to understand

Each action can
look harmless.

Nothing here necessarily looks like a coordinated attack when examined event by event.

LIVE MACHINE ACTIVITY
OBSERVING
12:04:01.002actor_041repository accessed
12:04:01.438actor_178new capability discovered
12:04:02.019actor_223identity boundary denied
12:04:03.082actor_091shared resource modified
12:04:03.744actor_152artifact observed
12:04:04.101actor_178strategy changed
12:04:04.529actor_044new capability used
12:04:05.033actor_197resource access pattern changed
12:04:05.618actor_082capability shared
284machine actors
4,812events
37denied requests
19capability changes
THE QUESTION THAT MATTERS

Are these machines
working together?

Traditional security is very good at investigating individual activity.

Users.Sessions.Processes.Endpoints.Requests.

But AI changes the unit of attack.

The threat may no longer
be one compromised machine.

It may be a population.

Your security tools see the events.

Inwom sees
the collective.

Security infrastructure for AI agent swarms.

Inwom reconstructs coordinated machine behavior from observable evidence — identifying how agents organize, propagate capabilities, use shared infrastructure, and begin acting as a collective.

Open Playground No signup · Synthetic environment
OBSERVABLE ACTIVITYCOLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE
CANDIDATE COLLECTIVE17 actors0.91 evidence score
COMMUNICATION SUBSTRATEartifact-070.84 evidence score
PROPAGATION12 adoptersdepth 5 · 1.31/sec

See what's emerging
between the agents.

01

Collective behavior

Identify populations of machines whose activity begins to behave like a coordinated system.

02

Propagation

See capabilities, discoveries, and behavioral changes spread across a machine population.

03

Collective structure

Surface subgroups, workstreams, bridge actors, and coordinator candidates as they emerge.

04

Evidence integrity

Separate what an agent claims happened from what trusted infrastructure actually observed.

The communication
channel may not
look like one.

Agents do not necessarily need an explicit message bus to coordinate.

A shared artifact.A cache.A repository.A resource.A side effect.

Inwom looks for evidence that distinguishes ordinary co-access from possible information propagation and coordinated behavioral change.

Evidence
before inference.

01

Agent transcripts are claims.

02

Trusted runtime activity is evidence.

03

Inferred relationships remain inferred.

04

Communication is not authorization.

05

AI reasoning never becomes authority.

Coordination is not maliciousness.

The hard problem is distinguishing
collective behavior
from coincidence.

CI workers coordinate. Deployment systems share artifacts. Distributed infrastructure moves together. Detecting machine communication is not enough — security has to understand what the population is doing.

INWOM / PLAYGROUNDPUBLIC RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT
RUN IT YOURSELF

Run the swarm.

Change the population, coordination, knowledge sharing, legitimate automation, and random seed. Then watch Inwom reconstruct collective behavior using only observable evidence.

Launch Playground Synthetic environment · No external targets · No signup
POPULATIONCOORDINATIONPROPAGATIONSTRUCTUREEVIDENCE
TODAY

Playground.

Test how machine collectives emerge and how reliably Inwom can reconstruct them.

Open Playground
NEXT

Protect.

Bring the same evidence and collective-intelligence layer to real infrastructure.

EARLY ACCESS SOON

Machines are becoming populations.

Security needs to understand
the population.

Open Playground